As a saying says, we are calling the same GOD with different names in different forms. What's NEW in our blog?
Let’s think from a third eye is God there? Priests says “what a ****** question is this”. I'm not denying the existence of God and heaven but holds that one cannot know for certain whether or not they exist. Sounds strange? That's Agnosticism Buddy.
Agnosticism is the view that knowledge of whether or not God exists is unattainable, that we cannot be justified in believing either that God does exist or that he does not. There are two approaches to arguing for this view: first, it can be argued that knowledge of God’s existence is unattainable because no evidence could ever justify religious belief; second, it can be argued that knowledge of God’s existence is unattainable because evidence of God’s existence is unattainable. One argument of each kind is considered here.The Argument from Uncertainty
The Argument from Uncertainty takes the fact that we cannot achieve certainty as to whether God exists as justification for agnosticism. Whatever evidence there is for theism and for atheism is fallible, the argument suggests, and therefore ought to be rejected. Of course, we accept fallible evidence as sufficient justification for many of our beliefs, so this argument will only be persuasive if there is some reason to require better evidence when answering religious questions than we require in these other cases. One possible reason for so doing is the importance of being right concerning the existence of God.
The Argument from Incomprehensibility
An alternative approach to arguing for agnosticism is the argument from Incomprehensibility. Theists have often been content to say that we are unable to comprehend God, that his being transcends our mundane experiences and that our concepts, which are derived from such experiences, cannot be used to describe him. If true, then this might be thought to count in favor of agnosticism; if we cannot comprehend God, then how can we reason with any confidence concerning his existence?
SO WHAT FOR YOU?
I believe now you started thinking about the presence of God. It’s damn simple. If you are praising God when you got succeed and criticizing him when got down, which means you don’t know what God is and you are blindly worshipping him for your egoism. If you are not confident about yourself and don’t believe in God you are an a**. It’s not all about God, the great. It’s about you.
Interesting !
ReplyDeleteQQ - whats the need to argue about the existence of God at all? Why believe or disbelieve? In other words, why don't we just leave God alone?
ReplyDeleteNamuh
namuh.neila@gmail.com
I have a few issues with your quote: "If you are not confident about yourself and don’t believe in God you are an a**."
ReplyDelete1. "a**", I suppose is "ass" = donkey; which is a perfectly acceptable language for independent published media. Unless, you are referring to something else.
2.It's such a stupid statement to make after stating what has already been out there for ages. You forget that there are a few who are quite comfortable with uncertainty! Those who do not fall in any of those areas in your pic or article.
3. To me - your statement means - God is the way to deal with uncertainty. I agree - but not the only option! However, those who look at the 'God' option tend to believe (Belief - is a subset of certainty - in certain schools), disbelieve or be doubtful. What about those, for whom God is NOT an option to deal with uncertainty? And trust me, there are a few of them out there whom you or I, in our right minds would not grade as an "ass" - without compromising your own credibility.
4. A few grammar mistakes which I guess all of us as susceptible to. God help us all here ;)
Why am I taking the trouble to write this to write this comment? I think its because its Tuesday and Tuesdays suck! But my Pastafarian belief says, it's because The Flying Spaghetti Monster willed so. Praises to his noodley appendage.
Namuh Neila
namuh.neila@gmail.com